A. I’ve been asked this question many times by those who don’t understand the difference between a medical consultation with a doctor and a non-medical consultation with me, so I’m glad to give a comprehensive answer here.
The most obvious difference is that when you consult with a surgeon, you will only be offered the procedures that he or she performs, which may or may not be the best, latest or most cost-effective options for you. Whereas I have unlimited access to all available procedures performed by various top medical professionals throughout the world, plus extensive knowledge of what really works and what doesn’t.
A surgeon doesn’t make his or her living from consultations. For example, although he/she may only charge $250 (or in your currency) for a consultation, a top surgeon can clear many thousands from a single facelift taking 2-3 hours. (That same surgeon performing only 5 operations a week will still take home at least one million a year.) Whereas I only do consultations, which also encompass: 1) Individual assessment. 2) Independent treatment plan often involving different specialist doctors. 3) Personal guidance and follow-up.
Surgeons may do up to 15 consultations in one day, generating bookings for operations worth many tens of thousands when patients proceed with surgery. I never do more than one consultation a day and give each client my undivided attention. The rest of the day will be spent following up previous clients, doing research, attending meetings and dealing with admin and other office duties.
Crucially, I take regular research sabbaticals in order to stay at the forefront of the highly complex and ever-evolving field of aesthetics and anti-ageing. This means it’s not possible for me to consult every week of the year, therefore the number of new clients I can take on is necessarily limited. While I’m obviously not qualified to do surgery (nor do I harbour any aspirations in that direction!) and have the utmost respect for the operating skills of our esteemed medical professionals, I’ve proven to be better informed on many, many occasions over the past 3 decades. This is due to the unpaid portion of my working year devoted to in-depth research and fact-finding.
In addition, during the past 33 years I’ve seen thousands of patient case histories up close that were performed by a myriad of different doctors from around the world. Few surgeons, if any, can say that. Not that it’s a competition, just stating the facts. To each consultation I bring over 60,000 hours’ experience and specialist knowledge acquired over a period of more three decades. Remember that I’ve been working in this field much longer than most cosmetic surgeons currently in practice. (And longer than ALL aesthetic doctors & clinics, since that particular specialty didn’t even exist three decades ago!)
A surgeon’s practice is supported by income generated from surgery. My consultancy is supported solely by income from consulting. I’ve invested heavily in my career on every level and carry all the usual business responsibilities and expenses including office overheads, staff wages, computer equipment, web hosting, banking fees, merchant commissions that take a percentage of each consultation payment, accounting & administration charges, travel expenses, 40% income tax and so on. Plus I personally fund the unpaid time I spend doing crucial research. It simply wouldn’t be viable to charge any less than I do. I’m often told by clients, as well as surgeons who understand the value of what I offer, that I undercharge for my one-of-a-kind service.
My clients can save a lot more money than the cost of a consultation by avoiding expensive mistakes like wasting money on treatments that don’t work, unknowingly spending way more than the going rate or getting botched and having to pay again for revision surgery. When a client starts their consultation by telling me they are planning a procedure that I know to be ill advised, ineffective or the wrong procedure for them and I explain why it’s a bad idea, they immediately save several thousand within the first few minutes. This scenario takes place all the time.
Only those who consult with me after making the wrong choices know the true value of getting the right information. They also save time and stress by not having to attempt researching through a minefield of misleading information, hidden advertising and media fabrications where the odds are stacked against you. And always remember that I work for you, not the doctors. I will tell you the unvarnished truth when no one else will. It’s your choice whether you think it’s worth consulting with me, just as it’s your decision whether or not to follow my recommendations.
A. One question inevitably leads to a dozen more in this complex field. If it’s truly a simple question that does not require my hard-earned specialist expertise or insider knowledge, the answer can probably be found elsewhere.
Like everyone with an online presence, my site receives lots of random inquiries from the internet, including so-called “simple questions.” It’s impossible to know who’s really behind them or what their motives truly are. (At least one underhand reporter has pretended to be a patient to try and attain material for a sham story.) I don’t have time or resources to divert away from my clients and consultancy, so please don’t take it personally if your general web enquiry cannot be addressed. However everyone wishing to have all their questions about procedures and doctors answered in depth and comprehensively may book a private consultation. Click here.
A. Having the independent treatment plan saves a lot of time and money, especially for those wishing to have a more than one procedure. My individually tailored treatment plans may include different specialist doctors and clinics for each procedure. Whereas a single medical practice typically only recommends the specialists they employ and only offers the options available within their clinic.
Increasingly, those who unwittingly act on the monumental amount of disinformation on the internet (fake reviews, manipulated images, etc.) end up requiring revision again and again as they try to reverse earlier procedures or have things done in completely the wrong order, zigzagging all over the place in a futile attempt to attain their ideal result. I’m seeing more and more clients who have been through that expensive and fruitless process. It’s obviously far better to have a solid treatment plan and get it right the first time. And not only to save time and money, but to avoid needing revision, which is often more complex with a less predictable outcome – plus the fewer general anaesthetics you have the better.
A. No regrets. If I’d trademarked it, it may not have gone into everyday use. Knowing that I contributed something to modern parlance is enough. Back in the 1980s and 1990s when I was doing a lot of media appearances, I referred to my transformation as an “Extreme Makeover.” No one had ever used surgery in that way before, so of course there was no name for it, or even any reason for such a term to exist. Others eventually picked up on it and started repeating it.
I thought of it because, growing up in the 60s, I was always fascinated by the before and after pictures of hair & makeup “makeovers,” as they were called, in the women’s magazines my mother bought. My transformation was like those makeovers (and was no doubt inspired by them), but extreme, so I put the two words together and coined the term Extreme Makeover. Now over 30 years later it’s widely used, including to describe things like home improvements and it’s even in dictionaries.
A. I’m based in London England and also consult in Geneva Switzerland, as well as globally via online video. Due to Covid-19 restrictions, I’m only doing online consultations until further notice, which have always been just as popular as in-person ones anyway and are equally beneficial to clients. There’s really very little difference between in-person and virtual consultations, except of course I don’t get the pleasure of meeting my clients in person, and they have the advantage of not having to leave the comfort of their own homes.
My enduring trademark style has always been timeless European elegance – never appearing obvious, overdone or outdated. Therefore I only recommend doctors who share this aesthetic and to whom I would entrust (or have entrusted) my own life and looks. Many are in the UK and Europe, but I can recommend truly excellent doctors in most parts of the world. If you wish to check to see if have doctors in a specific location before booking your consultation, please enquire first using the contact form.
A. Depending on your individual needs, cost will be determined at the time of your consultation. Fees for these top doctors are at the mid-range to upper end of the scale. However the most expensive surgery is having to have inferior results revised because you end up paying twice. I don’t recommend cut-price surgery or the cheap looking results they can produce. The best way to save money is by choosing wisely.
Beware of any clinics using my pictures or name to promote themselves by pretending they did my surgery. I’ve visited dozens of of clinics all over the world and been photographed and filmed with many different surgeons but that doesn’t mean I am a patient of any of them. The internet being what it is, I am aware that my name and photographs have been used by unscrupulous clinics I’ve never even heard of on their web sites and social media.
A. Please ignore whatever age Wikipedia randomly decides to assign me, it’s not a reliable source, a fact admitted on the site itself. Personal details such as my actual age and birthplace are private and have never been in the public domain, therefore Wikipedia has no access to such information. Yet they’ve repeatedly declared various ages and birthplaces for me over the years – none of them correct. Anyone can, and anyone does, edit their pages. If you click on the “View History” tab of any given page you can see the relentless revisions that go on. The statistics on Wikipedia’s page about me reveal that as of January 2021 there have been a mind-boggling 420 edits by 177 anonymous individuals I’ve never met who change something every 12.6 days!
Wikipedia even announced my death several years ago complete with macabre details of how I allegedly died and description of my funeral. Being very much alive and more than a little shaken as condolences flooded into my office, I identified myself to Wikipedia and corrected the page. Then comically, Wikipedia replied with a stern warning informing me, a “dead” person, that people are not allowed to correct pages about themselves! Staunchly defending false information from their approved source – a treacherous anonymous troll – they promptly reinstated full details of my untimely death. However when the story of Wikipedia killing me off appeared in the UK national press along with a news interview with me, they were forced to allow the truth, albeit with no apology. This type of willful misinformation is by no means unique, so I would never trust anything on Wikipedia.
Unfortunately the same goes for a good deal of today’s media. Studies show that 1) Fake news outperforms real news. 2) Lies spread faster in the population than truths. 3) Negative stories are more clicked on than positive ones. So it’s a calculated profits-over-facts strategy. Whereas my entire career has been built on nothing less than solid, accurate ongoing fact finding – people’s looks and lives depend on it – so I have zero patience with those who unashamedly mislead and misinform. Especially at my age…
My age: I’m in my early 60s. My exact age and birth date are kept private to prevent identity theft, as everyone’s should be these days. But early 60s is only my chronological age. According to my telomere analysis and advanced diagnostics, the biological age of my body and brain is that of someone in their 30s. Furthermore, the cumulative effect of my aesthetic procedures gives me a perceived age of 30-40, which I’m often mistaken for. So sixty is the new thirty! Or at least it can be. We have the technology.
A. Nothing, it’s just not for me. I have no intention of growing old and sick in the conventional sense. Instead I will continue to roll back the years from the inside out, never looking or feeling my chronological age, always working to maintain the younger biological and perceived age I’ve created. Further armed with my complete DNA and telomere profiles, I can monitor known inherited genetic variants that may or may not manifest. Such advantages didn’t exist way back in the time when the saying “growing old gracefully” was first coined.
A. As is the case with so many subjects, media stories about me are like snowflakes and fingerprints – no two are ever alike! The actual facts are only available on this site or from me directly. Like Wikipedia having no access to my birth records, the tabloid media have no access to my financial or medical records nor have they been present in the operating theatre with me for the past 30+ years. Their wildly varying numbers and bogus lists of operations are concocted out of thin air, despite the facts having always clearly stated here on my web site since the 1990s.
I’ve had 14 surgical procedures since 1987, some performed at the same time, totalling 9 actual full-scale operations. My meticulous planning meant I had very few general anaesthetics, as most things were done under local or sedation. Non-invasive and in-office procedures are not counted in the operation total.
Whereas the sensationalist media often make up much higher, ridiculously inflated numbers, sometimes going into the hundreds! And the internet repeats untruths like an echo chamber, adding more and more ops along the way. However, all claims of more than 14 surgical procedures (or 9 operations) are, like so many things you read these days, completely untrue and cynically fabricated for attention or click bait. More about that here.
If I’d actually undergone the crazy number of operations claimed by some sources, I’d look like a patchwork quilt! Instead, my aim has always been to appear completely natural with no traces of surgery. And health is my number one priority at all times, so I keep the number of general anaesthetics to an absolute minimum. The key is to maximise results with the fewest interventions possible. This saves time, money and – most importantly – exposure to the risk that every procedure carries, however minor.
I’ve also had numerous in-office and non-surgical treatments such as facial peels and tooth whitening, which confused the issue and some decided to count them as “operations.” Yet this equates to saying that someone who has Botox injections twice a year for 8 years and annual tooth bleaching has had 24 “operations.” While every minor incremental improvement does add to the overall picture, such treatments certainly do not constitute surgery or in any way compare to having a full-scale operation by a surgeon in an operating theatre under general anaesthetic. That’s exactly how my Guinness Record for “Most Cosmetic Procedures” (It was NEVER “Most Operations”) came about over twenty years ago. Every single non-surgical beauty treatment was counted in the total. Since there had never been an Extreme Makeover before, they had no idea how to present it.
In terms of money, I’ve spent a total of around £60,000 since 1987, which I easily made back from television appearances in the 1990s and early 2000s. I’ve also profited from owning exclusive copyright to my photographs. (I’m often asked why I’m not on TV as much as I use to be: It was a different time. TV shows were more respectful and used to pay extremely well for guest interviews, especially as I was virtually the only one talking about cosmetic surgery and pioneer of the world’s first Extreme Makeover. Things have changed a lot since then. Nowadays I’m very selective and decline to take part in the banal, sensationalist circus that a lot of shows have become in their bid to compete with the internet for attention. TV programs are required to achieve certain ratings in order to survive, so in many cases their ethics have necessarily plummeted, whereas mine have stayed the same.)
To sum up, it simply isn’t necessary, or good for your health, to have dozens of operations or to spend vast fortunes to achieve fantastic improvements. Quality over quantity, always.
As Warren Buffet said, “Investing in yourself pays dividends in ways that no property or stocks & shares can.” I witness that on a daily basis, both personally and with my clients.
A. No, that’s not possible considering I started over 30 years ago. I’ve been to many, many doctors over the years, regularly replacing them when they retired, situations changed or better new doctors qualified and moved up through the ranks. I’m always amazed when some long-retired surgeon tells me they were contacted by a patient who’d heard, often mistakenly, that I went to him or recommended him way back in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, etc.
Additionally, I choose different doctors for different procedures, for my clients and myself, depending on their area of expertise.
The key is to go to the best doctor for each procedure at any given time. While past practitioners were absolutely the right choices at the time, the situation is constantly evolving. Plus the number of doctors specialising in aesthetics isn’t so limited as was in the past. It’s now an incredibly crowded market, which has created a vast amount of choice, and correspondingly a vast amount of confusion for prospective patients.
My unswerving loyalty has always been to my plan, never to any particular doctor. Doctors are human; their abilities may improve or deteriorate over time. Patients often make the mistake of randomly choosing one surgeon, doctor or dentist then going to him/her forever. This type of loyalty is human nature, but it can work against you. I’ve always cherry-picked the best of the best at the time for each procedure, changing practitioners accordingly. And keeping current with who excels at what is more than a full-time job. This has probably been the most important key to my success for over three decades.
Please note: My recommendations are up-to-the-minute and clients are referred to my current A-Team. All referrals must be re-confirmed if clients wish to proceed with treatment more than 6 months after our consultation. (There is no extra charge within 12 months after your consultation.) Just like your phone apps and computer operating systems, my specialised information is subject to critical updates!
A. The natural look is proven to be most attractive to observers by far. Genuinely age-defying, beautifully authentic results are the Holy Grail of results and require exceptional skills to produce. Whereas obvious-looking plastic surgery is by far less challenging for the doctor.
Talented surgeons produce beautiful results that enhance individual character and personality. Patients with overdone or unnatural results often end up with a similar generic appearance.
The “operated-on” look is outdated, being reminiscent of an era before sophisticated techniques were available. For example, my mature clients don’t end up merely looking like an old person who’s had a facelift – instead they appear convincingly much younger than their years. Looking “plastic” goes against the very premise of anti-ageing; youth by definition calls for a fresh and natural appearance.
In addition, unnatural surgical results will age badly, appearing increasingly odd as years go by. We’ve all seen well-known cases of this in the media. Previously overdone patients seeking “make-under” surgery is a growing trend. Only natural-looking results will stand the test of time.
Most concerning however, is that fake looking surgery can be a sign of risky practice where more advanced medical competence is lacking generally.
Many of my clients are in the public eye, top executives or otherwise in positions of responsibility & respect who keep their procedures a closely guarded secret. Having credibility and being taken seriously is an important part of their personal and public identity. They also wish to look naturally young and attractive so their worst nightmare would be ending up with a wind-tunnel face, slug lips, expressionless eyes, denture-like veneers, gigantic silicone breasts, over-inflated buttocks, crudely tattooed eyebrows or any other unrealistic result that instantly lowers the bearer’s credibility and perceived I.Q. From an anthropological viewpoint, intelligence, attraction and natural selection are intrinsically linked with success.
Lastly, with the pandemic-driven increase of video communication and conferencing, obvious surgery is very noticeable on webcam, whereas natural results are not.
Below: The rose on the left is obviously fake. But you can’t tell if the one on the right is real or not. This illustrates the difference between inferior cosmetic surgery results and the absolute best. (FYI they are both fake!)
A. 1) Because most botched or otherwise dissatisfied patients who come to me for help found their doctors using the internet. 2) Some of the best doctors are not prominent on the internet or all over social media. Nor do they wish to be celebrities or media stars.
For those with serious medical conditions, there are wonderful online support groups and helpful resources for illnesses, disease and non-elective surgery. You can learn an immense amount by researching innumerable subjects online. And using the internet to comparison shop for things like household items saves time and money. However you cannot “do your research” in this field in the same way. When it comes to the lucrative business of aesthetics and cosmetic surgery, the internet is an ever-expanding pool of hidden advertising, hearsay and self-promotion where followers, before & after pictures and positive reviews can be bought and sold.
Search results are biased according to your location, browsing history, sponsored content and the SEO of any given site. (To see this in action, try doing identical searches from another computer, search engine or location and compare the vastly different results.) The sheer amount of grossly incorrect information mixed in with the facts only serves to confuse and mislead, fuelling an alarming increase in botched patients who made life-changing choices based on internet search results.
Once something is online it’s in the public domain forever, regardless of whether it’s true or not. It can then be quoted repeatedly or copied & pasted again and again. So you unknowingly come across plenty of obsolete outdated information that may be completely false.
The internet enables access to an infinite amount of information, misinformation and disinformation. And then there are the omissions; I’ve seen warnings about certain problematic procedures disappear from web sites, no doubt after pressure from those who profit from them.
Not everything you need to know can be found online, especially in aesthetics. Otherwise the fastest growing branch of cosmetic surgery would not be the tidal wave of do-overs and ever increasing demand for revision of unsatisfactory results.
A. See previous question. Although these can be entertaining, it’s well known that they’re a marketplace for doctors and clinics, rife with planted reviews, fake case histories, outdated (over 6 months old) postings, photoshopped pictures, paid-for ratings and conflicting opinions.
High-traffic web sites are costly to host and maintain. Always look into how “free” information sites are funded and exactly who benefits financially.
Even with my vast network and global reach, I don’t know of any patients who actually post on these sites, do you? Certainly none of my private clients want their personal photos or details online, knowing that their IP address can always be identified. It doesn’t seem to be something in which your typical cosmetic surgery patient participates.
A. No, no one else in the world. If you happen to see my intellectual property copied from this site and used elsewhere, please let me know using the Contact Form. It happens a lot. Pages from my previous web site were copied word for word by various unscrupulous individuals attempting to set themselves up in copycat businesses, all whom inevitably failed. This job requires an incredible amount of time, ongoing financial investment, dedication and concern for the welfare of others above and beyond the mere ability to copy and paste.
A. Demand for do-over procedures grows exponentially every year. For some time now, most of my clients have had some kind of previous unsatisfactory treatment before consulting with me. They range from mediocre results all the way to being being badly botched. Bear in mind that it can be challenging to produce a natural-looking result when revising inferior work.
Most common regrets are:
Another big regret is getting only fair or average results – when the procedure has been performed correctly but the result is ultimately not as beautiful as it could have been. By definition this is actually how the majority of results turn out on the surgical spectrum. A lot of disappointed patients who turn to me in desperation end up paying twice (or many times more) and having their surgery all over again to finally get the more rarified truly excellent results they wanted the first time. The top end of the spectrum of results that I specialise in are the exception and never just happen by chance.
A. Acting on the wrong information.
A. Sorry, no. Everyone’s secrets are safe with me and they usually deny having had any work done anyway. Each client’s privacy is equally respected whether or not they are famous, which is why I would never speak about any them or post their before and after photos. (My own before and after pictures are the best example of what can be achieved.)
However I can share something interesting and unique about them. My celebrity clients often retain my services to help them through their surgical process from beginning to end, including assisting with travel arrangements and hospital admissions, which means I work with their passport details and medical forms. And it’s not unusual for these to reveal that they are on average 3 to 5 years older than they claim, having used a younger age when they first began their careers. This may go some way to explaining the enormous celebrity client interest in my Extreme Anti-Ageing treatment plans. Not only do they wish to look younger than they are, they also wish to look younger than they are widely believed to be!
A. Not when properly performed. Although there may be moments of discomfort and inconvenience, if it were truly painful and difficult to manage, then so many millions of people around the world wouldn’t have it – and that includes me. Nobody likes pain!
A. That’s hard to say. Over the years I’ve met many highly intelligent, extremely capable people who made terrible errors in judgement with their health and looks after trusting the wrong sources. I think the combination of being an insider with access to genuine factual data, observing thousands of case histories firsthand (including my own) and an extensive network of the world’s top medical professionals to cross-check with have been more important. In addition, my lifelong habits of using common sense, exercising extreme caution, fact-checking and making choices based on verified information have all been essential. Not forgetting my art background, which means I’m able to view the human form in an analytical way that most others don’t see – an ability that top doctors also possess. The combination of all of the above, along with knowing the full selection of available procedures and works and what doesn’t, gives as much a guarantee of success as it’s possible to have.
A. Absolutely, it’s a question I alway ask and have extensive data on the subject. Here are some of the top reasons.
A. Whether in the UK or Switzerland, most days I speak to top doctors about various matters. Sometimes I observe procedures in the operating theatre. I may see a new client or two and spend time following up ongoing clients. When a client has booked me to accompany them throughout their treatment, I block out a week or so and am solely dedicated to their care. Some weeks I travel to medical conferences, where I’m often a guest speaker. I never stop learning and am a voracious reader of the latest medical publications and peer-review papers on cosmetic surgery and aesthetics. Over the decades all of these activities, plus regularly visiting eminent doctors around the world, have enabled me to stay at the forefront of my chosen combined specialties. Then there’s the day-to-day paperwork, accounts and admin. So I’m pretty busy!
As cloning is not yet available, I’m still only one person so the number of new clients I can take on is necessarily limited! Please bear this in mind if you’re considering booking a consultation with me.
Observing surgery in the operating theatre.
A. No. I have so much passion for what I do and there are always new things to learn, which helps keep me young. Since I use my own research on a daily basis for my own health, anti-aging and beauty program too, if I retired not only would my clients lose out, so would I. It’s impossible to obtain genuine information and know how to get the very best results without being an insider. No one else on the planet connects the dots across these specialities – or puts them into practice every single day both personally and professionally.
The cumulative up-to-the-minute knowledge I continue to gain from resources such as medical conferences, lectures, conversations with top doctors and clients (I learn something from every single client) grows in leaps and bounds every year. I intend to continue to benefit from it and offer the same to my clients for the rest of my life – which I plan to be long, healthy and of course age-defying!
A. Fashion doesn’t interest me. It changes constantly, like the shifting sands. However “style” is timeless. I view fashion obsession as yet another way to keep women busy and financially disempowered. Whereas beauty is power and health is wealth. With self-confidence you wear everything better. And with good health you can do so for longer.
I like denim for its timeless versatility and ease in packing. The Steve Jobs “6 identical-shirts-and-jeans” style suits me perfectly, adding individual touches with a colourful jacket, scarf or accessories acquired on my travels. Not being a fashion slave frees up loads of time and money for other pursuits. The casual look is also way more youthful.
A. I love to travel, so have been blessed that my career has taken me all the way around the world and back several times. Material possessions mean little to me. We all come into life with nothing and leave it with nothing. Time and freedom are the real luxuries in life and I don’t take either one for granted.
A. Everything is here on my web site so there’s no need for social media. I don’t put my private life on the internet or wish to court validation or pseudo friendships from unknown persons in cyberspace. And I’m certainly not influenced by “influencers!”
Social media mainly exists for monetised advertising and exploitation of your personal data. Since I don’t do paid endorsements nor am I in show business or retail, spending precious time trying to attract a multitude of anonymous “likes” and followers makes no sense in my case. (And every time you “like” something on social media, or click on the bait, it’s noted and used to profile you for targeted advertising.) A lot of eminent medical professionals, academics and others at the very top of their game aren’t on social media either.
You never know who’s watching. Nor can I understand why anyone would put their date of birth online. It’s so useful for identity thieves. The same goes for posting photos of their homes and valuables, while constantly updating their exact whereabouts on social media – an absolute godsend for burglars, as many have learned to their cost.
At one time I did have an Instagram page and a business Facebook account I posted on from time to time, but closed them when the media started helping themselves to my copyright photos to use in fake news stories, even making up silly quotes I never said, and never would say, to use with my pictures. The full story about that is here.
I stopped writing my regular blog after seeing it copied and pasted elsewhere by others who brazenly took credit for my research, putting their own name to my words. But that’s the internet! It’s impossible to post anything online that won’t be copied and re-posted out of context as long as someone somewhere believes it will bring them more clicks. So increasingly people with anything of value to contribute don’t bother, or else they put their work behind paywalls. Hence the internet’s dwindling number of trustworthy sources and decline in quality of free information.
Instead of the current unhealthy trend of being preoccupied with a phone or sitting in front of a computer for hours, my downtime is spent in the great outdoors enjoying nature. Sitting is the new smoking!
COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENT: CLINICS ARE FULLY OPEN AND OPERATIONAL FOR ALL SURGICAL & NONSURGICAL PROCEDURES
Private consultations with me are available to suit your schedule and location via video using FaceTime, WhatsApp, Google Meet or Skype. Alternatively by telephone or email with pre-emailed photos. Longer consultations upon application. Additionally by special arrangement, I may be retained for extended ongoing support.
Each one hour in-depth consultation includes assessment of your particular needs to create an individual treatment plan for up to two surgical operations plus any nonsurgical treatments of interest, and follow-up afterwards. Further consultations must be booked for subsequent procedures. More information here.
As this is a very quickly-evolving field, all recommendations are valid for 6 months only and may be re-confirmed with me via email. After 12 months, if more procedures are desired a new consultation is required. All consultations are with me personally. You are assured of absolute confidentiality at all times.